constructive speechの例文

• Rebuttal speeches must address arguments made in the constructive speeches.
• This diminishes the principle that the best response to hateful speech is constructive speech and public condemnation.
• Each speaker was cross-examined by an opponent for a period following his or her constructive speech.
• During constructive speeches, debaters may introduce new arguments and the speaker's opponents may rise to ask questions of the speaker.
• The first affirmative and negative speeches are constructive speeches, intended to put forth the arguments which will comprise the issues in dispute.
• It is not inappropriate to ask the judges view on allowing new arguments in the 2NC; after all it is a constructive speech.
• It begins with an affirmative first-speaker constructive speech, followed by a negative; then an affirmative and negative second-speaker constructive speech respectively.
• It begins with an affirmative first-speaker constructive speech, followed by a negative; then an affirmative and negative second-speaker constructive speech respectively.
• The "'case "'is the advocacy established by the First affirmative constructive speech, often constructed around the support of a policy recommendation known as the affirmative plan.
• It is also called cross-examination debate ( sometimes shortened to Cross-X, CX, or C-X ) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech.
• Next, the other side is permitted to give its first four-minute constructive speech in which not only arguments may be presented, but rebuttals to arguments from the first speech as well.
• In high school, all four constructive speeches are generally eight minutes long and all four rebuttal speeches are four or five minutes in length depending on the region; in college they are nine and six minutes long respectively.
• Although, this only applies to the second speaker as the first team should not have had any points rebutted yet . ) Then, the second speaker of the second team gives a four-minute constructive speech following this same format.
• Several aspects of NEDA make it distinct from other debate organizations, including the ability to decide topicality at the end of the constructive speeches, the ability of judges to give " double losses " in those cases in which neither team argues in a manner consistent befitting a public advocate, closed cross examination, and a focus on argumentation and delivery.